Co-lead trial counsel for ASSIA, founded by a Stanford University professor, in high-stakes patent enforcement action targeting Charter’s Spectrum services implementing patented wireless optimization and profile management technology. Successfully defeated motion to transfer, obtained favorable claim construction, and achieved PTAB clean sweep with denial of all five inter partes review petitions challenging ASSIA’s foundational patents. Set for trial 2026. Opposing counsel: Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Greenberg Traurig. Ongoing.

Co-lead trial counsel representing technology company in patent enforcement action against Apple involving foundational display brightness control technology originally developed by Microsemi and implemented across iPhone and MacBook product lines. Set for trial 2027. Opposing counsel: Morrison Foerster. Ongoing.

Co-lead trial counsel representing IngenioSpec, a pioneer in wearable electronics innovation, in two patent enforcement actions against Apple targeting AirPods, AirPods Pro, and Beats products. Cases assert six patents covering foundational wireless earbud technologies including hearing enhancement systems, wireless communication techniques, and charging infrastructure. Set for trial 2027. Opposing counsel: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner. Ongoing.

Trial counsel in patent litigation against Samsung involving mobile device user interface technology implemented across Galaxy smartphone and tablet product lines. Case asserts three patents covering innovative touch interface designs, virtual keyboards, and edge-based touch event capture systems. Set for trial 2026. Opposing counsel: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner. Ongoing.

Lead counsel in patent enforcement action against major telecommunications carriers involving STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication and fraud-prevention technology. Obtained favorable claim construction before achieving successful settlement with all defendants including Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile after establishing strong infringement positions. Opposing counsel: Duane Morris.

Trial counsel representing Polaris in its patent infringement case against Dell and Microsoft Corp. relating to display screen automatic brightness control technology. Achieved favorable settlement following successful claim construction. Opposing counsel: Covington & Burling and Alston & Bird.

Lead trial counsel for Papst in patent enforcement action against Samsung involving data transfer and USB interface technology. Secured $5.9 million jury verdict for willful patent infringement, with court denying Samsung’s post-trial motions to overturn the verdict following extensive post-trial briefing.

Represented Preservation Technologies in enforcement of patents developed by the University of Southern California relating to architecture and techniques for indexing, accessing, distributing, and surveying multimedia data. Attained favorable settlements against multiple accused infringers, including Netflix, DISH, Facebook, Sony, and Hulu, after securing favorable discovery and pleading-stage rulings. Opposing counsel: Latham & Watkins; Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman; Baker Botts; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; Cooley; Fenwick & West; and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.

Represented KlausTech in action alleging Google’s infringement of a patent claiming a process for Internet advertising on websites and mobile applications. Case settled favorably after defeating two motions to dismiss and an invalidity challenge during claim construction. Also represented KlausTech on appeal of prior patent infringement action against Google. Opposing counsel: Paul Hastings.

Represented a large research university and its exclusive licensee in a patent infringement suit against a Fortune 50 computerized search company. Case settled favorably after jury selection. Opposing counsel: Fish & Richardson and King & Spalding.